Syntagma Digital
Editor, John Evans
Holidays

Midweek Mysticism: The end of the road?

Extra Sensory Perception

When I was six or seven I encountered death for the first time. I found my pet budgerigar stiff in the sawdust at the bottom of his cage.

I was both devastated and fascinated. I could see he was dead because something mysterious had left his body.

Later I called this, personage because it was what made him who he was. And now it had vanished. The aliveness was gone.

Much later I had the same experience when both my father and mother passed away.

My psychology professor refused to expand on the topic because, he said, it was a religious thing, not psychological.

I couldn’t see the difference. If personage doesn’t impinge on psychology what does? I think he was a little scared of death, as so many people are.

Determined to get to the bottom of the mystery I sought out the people who were equally fascinated by it. The first was a psychologist, the great Carl (C.G) Jung who led me into, first, mythology and then mysticism, all through his voluminous writings which have lasted well.

But I wanted more. I had read many mystical books in which some advanced souls had experienced “death in life”, that is to say mystical (spiritual) experiences, including out-of-body states.

Later I went through the gamut of such experiences myself, all within the context of a normal life. These were always given not self-induced, although years of reading and practice must have played a part. I think life will deliver what you ask for, if you make the right preparations.

All this has confirmed what has always been believed — better, known — by advanced souls and mystical adventurers: that death is not what it seems.

It is much more interesting than that.

John Evans

Coming soon to a bookseller near you: Practical Mysticism: A different way of looking at the world.

Recent Related Articles

Do you have a view? Comments Off

Saturday Ramble: Losing your mind in peak experience

Colin Wilson

Colin Wilson

With the recent death of prolific author, Colin Wilson, I thought it appropriate to reprise one of his favourite themes: the peak experience.

Neurologist David Eagleman describes how our conscious mind knows nothing of what is happening in the brain where our lives are plotted out in detail well in advance of our knowing about it and acting on it. We are nothing but puppets on a string, according to science.

That basic template might be true as far as it goes, except that the process takes place outside the physical brain, which may be just a translation device, an interface, into the body.

Moreover, simple mystical techniques can return control of even the most shadowy of activities.

In my forthcoming book, provisionally titled A different way of looking at the world, the theme is developed beyond the stage of “seeing into the nature of reality”, the centrepiece of the first volume*. It covers the ground of the genuine mystic as a scientist of immateriality, by which I mean the physically unknowable: the cloud of unknowing.

It centres on a relentless pursuit of firsthand knowledge, a single-minded drive for the perfection of experiential knowing that can’t be mistaken for the truth because it is the truth.

A motor racing driver is a good analogy. He risks life and bones to arrive at a state where every bodily response to unpredictable circumstances is controlled by apparently automatic impulses. Indeed, to “think” about anything at all would spell disaster. Daydreaming or calculation would mean death at this level of performance. It could almost be described as an advanced form of meditation.

The reward is a sustained sense of elation, as consciousness seems to split from normal mind patterns and the inhibitions of daily existence. Total immersion in this state releases an experience close to spiritual exaltation, as slow, clunky thought processes give way before the unity of body and soul.

Many of us have experienced moments of peak experience when playing sports. Suddenly everything seems to go right: balls hit the right side of the line in tennis time and again, or the back of the net in football; there’s a surge of ecstatic energy in running or rugby; we’re suddenly stroking the ball to the boundary in cricket. For a while we can do nothing wrong. Our opponents watch in dismay. It doesn’t last, but we sure as hell remember it.

A mystic would observe that the “normal” mind is nowhere to be found during peak periods. The American psychologist Abraham Maslow has written extensively on these experiences; for a broad coverage of the field, see Colin Wilson’s New Pathways in Psychology.

These are just the foothills of dedicated mystical experience, but it illustrates the splitting off, and falling away, of normality required for full-blown experience of the ineffable. Paradoxically, this turns out to be more real than life itself.

Both my books explores the fundamental workings of what lies beneath the material world through experience, not through an electron microscope.

Physics always struggles to separate the scientist from the object under observation, straining for objectivity. Contrarily, the mystic plunges into the object area, observing it from within. Both quantum mechanics and mysticism demonstrate that objectivity is a deception by the egoic mind.

You won’t learn how to swim without jumping into water. Textbooks and all the mathematical demonstrations in the world won’t crack it. Experience of the actuality is essential.

Mysticism is not incompatible with science, as Isaac Newton, Francis Bacon, and, in recent times, others such as Fritjof Capra have shown. It represents the essence of who we are, from which we arise, and whence we return.

We need both sides to give us anything like a complete picture of the world, as all the spiritual texts ever written firmly attest.

* The Eternal Quest for Immortality

John Evans

… who is the author of The Eternal Quest for Immortality: Is it staring you in the face? Available from Amazon and all good booksellers.

Coming soon: Practical Mysticism: A different way of looking at the world.

Recent Related Articles

Do you have a view? Comments Off

Midweek Mysticism: The still, small disruptive voice

FearMost of us are aware of a voice, apparently in our heads, that chatters away much of the time. It is not totally coherent and seems to flit over a variety of subject areas in a rambling manner. We think of it as “me”.

It isn’t.

In severe cases it can overwhelm an undisciplined mind and drive an individual to the brink of madness. But why is it there? What purpose does it serve?

When we are deeply interested in something, the intense force of our concentration overrides the chattering imp and silences it. Close observation of our mind, as in meditation, soon shows the voice who’s boss. Watch a cat stalking a mouse or a bird. It’s a masterclass in total integration of body and mind, embodied in silence.

Modern humans are split in many ways. The voice is only one indication, but the most apparent. The trouble is, we can’t abide silence and use many props, such as radio, TV, cinema and telephone, to overcome random silence.

Yet, in that silence lies sanity and wholeness. We are not the voice. We are the awareness in which our whole being floats.

To centre ourselves in that awareness is to be wholly who we are, free of the self-generated noise and din of the busyness we take for life. When we are wrapt in a book, or even writing one, we become like the cat, fully ourselves.

John Evans

… who is the author of The Eternal Quest for Immortality: Is it staring you in the face? Available from Amazon and all good booksellers.

To be published soon: Practical Spirituality: A different way of looking at the world.

Recent Related Articles

Do you have a view? Comments Off

Midweek Mysticism: The Soul — does it exist and can we experience it?

Out of body

The soul is usually understood as a mythical entity in our sceptical — I was going to say scientific — age, although that is only a half-truth. The word is occasionally used in a poetical sense as the essence of a person, but with no corresponding reality.

Again, some people hedge their bets by doubling it up as in “the heart and soul” of someone, where the words are practically synonymous. Modern humans get very confused about their souls.

Soul is often coupled with the adjective immortal — “my immortal soul”. What is the truth? Do you have a soul? Does everyone? And what does it look like? What does it do? Is it really immortal?

As a lifelong student of mysticism I have, as it happens, arrived at impeccable conclusions, backed by evidence, which being personal, even though various, might not satisfy the most sceptical of “scientific” minds. It was ever thus.

We are generally aware that our being has two distinct parts: body and brain. Although the brain is part of the body and dies with it, we nevertheless regard it as, in some way, separate. In terms of sentience, we should refine that to: bodily senses and mind. We know where we are with these, we see and feel them in action every day.

But most people are aware that there is more to it than physicality, overwhelmingly present though that is. Could there be a “ghost in the machine”?

There really has to be if we are to explain so many apparently peripheral activities and unexplained happenings. The links at the bottom of this piece represent a data trail that builds up a compelling picture of the soul and its connections with the world we live in.

The precise two-part reality of humans is body and soul, where the soul has a spiritual nature that only tangentially impinges on the physical. Once you have experienced your own soul — and it is there to be experienced with the necessary effort and concentration — you will have grasped the fundamental nature of humanity and its place in the firmament.

You will know that it is fundamentally different from the physical body and brain. It has to be experienced rather than explained. No form of words can express the magnitude of its reality. My own reaction to its appearance in my consciousness was, “So it’s all true! There is nothing missing now.”

And indeed what else is there to say?

Links. Regular returners will have seen them before, so skip if you must.

The soul revealed
Divine Light experience
Mind and consciousness defined
Nirvana defined
What is God?
Mysticism is the soul of science
How does the body fit in with mysticism?

There are many more on this site if you want to pursue them.

John Evans

To be published soon: Mystology: A different way of looking at the world.

Recent Related Articles

Do you have a view? Comments Off

Christmas Mysticism: Angels are like shards of light

Angels?

One of the doubts I have always held about the Catholic Church is that it treats its followers a bit like children. When I see the standard-issue stories about Heaven, Hell, Angels, God, the Devil, and all the other guys in the band, it’s easy to recognise “the old rhetorical language of the Church”.

People today are much more sophisticated than the peasantry of old. Universal education, science, well-informed television news and documentaries, plus daily newspapers, keep even the poorest up to speed. It is utterly counter-productive to impose a paternalist overview on “the flock”. Headless chickens, they are not.

Pope Francis seems to have recognised this temporal disjunction and set about reforming it. Rome has now opened a second front: Angels are “shards of light,” not humanoids with wings.

“Angelologist” Father Renzo Lavator, speaking at a conference on angels in Rome, said: “They are a bit like sunlight that refracts on you through a crystal vase,” which is both a poetic and a precise picture of what appears.

Now, I’m sure that various psychologists, who did not experience this, will write about “hallucinations” and “seeing what they want to see”.

Humanoid visions, perhaps, but angels as shards? I don’t think so. As a trained psychologist myself, I retort (in advance of their inevitable response), grow up and recognise that you do not know everything, nor have you experienced this “out of body state”.

The good Father is also an optimist, as mystics should be: “Pope Francis talks more about the devil than about angels and I think rightly so. But it’s still early, he will get round to the angels too.”

John Evans

… who is the author of The Eternal Quest for Immortality: Is it staring you in the face? Available from Amazon and all good booksellers.

Coming eventually: Mystology: A different way of looking at the world..

Recent Related Articles

Do you have a view? Comments Off