We can see clearly now that the UK is totally out of touch with what is going on in Brussels. New developments today point to a widening gap between EU policy and British aspirations. These will become critical when a Conservative Government takes power within three months.

It’s only a month since the European Constitution, known colloquially as the Lisbon Treaty, came into force across Europe.

Despite the assurances and soothing voices from all sides, it is now starting to bite, with the Commission demanding a full-scale “economic government” for Europe.

Using the problems of Greece as an excuse, the federalists are in full pursuit of their quarry. The apparent backing down of Germany yesterday makes the outcome more likely, even inevitable in the short term.

Jose-Manuel Barroso, the Commission president, said that “Brussels has treaty powers allowing it to take the reins of economic management.
This is a time for boldness. I believe that our economic and social situation demands a radical shift from the status quo. And the new Lisbon Treaty allows this.”

Brown’s “red lines” are melting like icicles in the Athens sun.

Tomorrow, Thursday, Gordon Brown goes to Brussels for an EU summit which will be dominated by the Club Med crisis and the immediate future of Greece. Once again, a British Prime Minister will be up against the full force of European hegemonic zeal. Given Brown’s character and inability to face up to those stronger than himself, the outlook is not good.

Both Douglas Carswell (Conservative) and Gisela Stuart (Labour) today demanded assurances from Brown at PMQs that Britain would not get involved in eurozone matters, nor extend taxpayers money to Greece.

Brown’s reply was meticulously prepared, pointing to the new IMF facility which he knows Brussels is determined not to access. A typical EU stitchup is on the cards.

Surely now the Conservatives must make their case clear. They need to step back from this wretched powerplay.

John Evans

Breaking News: The Lisbon Treaty is set to become law within weeks after the Czech Republic’s eurosceptic president, Vaclav Klaus, conceded his attempt to challenge it was futile.

It was once considered normal to ask for a two-thirds vote in favour to bring about major constitutional change.

The European Union has succeeded in stamping out any votes at all on itself. Where that has not been possible, as in Ireland, it has demanded just a simple majority. These now rare plebiscites have been accompanied by all kinds of foul play and the bribery of reluctant electorates.

Apart from numerous treaties of accession over the years, the main instruments binding countries into the sticky web of euro politics have been:

Acts of Accession 1972: Brought UK into Common Market (PM: Edward Heath).
Single European Act: Introduced the Single Market and European Political Cooperation (PM: Margaret Thatcher).
Treaty on European Union, Maastricht: 1997. (PM: John Major).
Treaty of Amsterdam: Introduced the High Representative, transferred powers to EC and integrated the Schengen Agreement. (PM: Tony Blair).
Treaty of Nice: prepared the EU to cope with enlargement. (PM: Tony Blair).
Lisbon (EU Constitution) Treaty (Not yet in force). (PM: Gordon Brown).

Even a cursory glance at public opinion at the times of implementation of these treaties demonstrates that all of them would have been lost to British referenda. Many other countries would also have voted against, most significantly perhaps, Germany when required to give up the Deutsche Mark by the Maastricht Treaty.

The political class has been widely divergent from the general public view on almost all matters European, especially in Britain. Realizing this, Brussels has adopted dishonesty, even treachery, as its preferred method of attack.

For Britain, the beginning of it all was the Acts of Accession in 1972, rammed through Parliament by Edward Heath as part of his miserable three-and-a-bit years in Number 10, which also included a three-day week and a crippling miners’ strike.

Heath promised he would only go ahead with membership of the then Common Market if a substantial majority supported it. In the event, his whips had to frogmarch aged and infirm Tory MPs through the voting lobby, even when they were against entry — I believe affidavits exist confirming the rumour. His fraudulent eight-vote victory was hardly a “substantial majority”. There’s little doubt the application would have been lost in a popular referendum.

When Britain was finally granted one three years later by Harold Wilson, the wily old fox set his swivel-eyed Cabinet colleagues free to oppose it. Thus the “no” campaign was led by the likes of Tony Benn and many from the hard left. Wilson got the vote he wanted.

The Single European Act, opened the way for the so-called single market of 1992. I’m convinced a British referendum would have scuppered it. Tellingly Margaret Thatcher complained afterwards that she had been duped by the French president of the Commission, Jacques Delors. The headline in The Sun newspaper said it all: “Up Yours, Delors!”

The people were against it. We still got it.

And so it rolls on. Maastricht squeaked through Parliament with tiny majorities after heroic whipping operations. The people, though, would have flattened it. Only John Major’s negotiated opt-outs from the single currency and the social chapter saved the day for the europhiles.

Note that Labour has since signed the social chapter, and Tony Blair and Peter Mandelson would have liked to take the country into the euro currency, with obvious deadly results.

The moral is that even opt-outs are no protection from the advent of a Labour government, as Brussels knows only too well. If you sign up to a treaty, you’ll get most of it in the end.

The open wounds from the current Treaty of Lisbon are still raw. Britain was promised a referendum, but Blair conspired with Germany’s Angela Merkel, France’s Nicolas Sarkozy, Peter Mandelson and others to rat on the pledge. By the by, Blair would become Europe’s first president and that looks a likely appointment before the end of the year.

Again, a vote in Britain would have crushed this treaty for good.

The ongoing tragedy of this tale is that had Heath been square with the people and offered them a vote in 1972, even with a simple majority, the UK would never have entered what is now the EU in the first place. As time went on and Europe became more integrated, it would never have been possible to persuade the public to enter the so-called community.

The European saga is one of the most scandalous betrayals in all history. Because the power has been “salami-sliced” over 37 years, many people are only just waking up to the enormity of it.

Our only hopes now are that, 1) economic conditions get massively worse and the EU disintegrates as it deserves to do, or 2) David Cameron’s Conservatives win the General Election in May and set about restoring full powers to Parliament and the people of Britain, who are maritime Atlanteans, and have never been Europeans.

John Evans

Recent Related Commentary
Saturday Ramble: For ever and a day
Saturday Ramble: The real solution for the British economy
Saturday Ramble: Six days to party time or Armageddon
Saturday Ramble: We need an emphatic Irish No vote

Labour MP, Gisela Stuart’s prescient warning of a “democratic deficit” inherent in the Lisbon Treaty is a rare moment of clarity from a mainstream politician on the almost taboo subject of the European Union.

The treaty, she said, would leave EU leaders accountable to no one, and with the ablility to grab yet more power from nations without consultation. It contains a “ratchet clause” that permits the closing down of national vetoes by diktat.

There will be “no more treaties, no more referendums anywhere” on future transfers of power from the nation states to Brussels. Gordon Brown’s hollow promise that there would be no more treaties for at least 10 years was, as ever, subtly misleading.

She went on, “My basic test of democracy is: can I get rid of them? By casting a vote, you can change the people who are in control of you. Lisbon does not give you, as a citizen, the means to control the executive or the politicians who decide on your behalf, and that’s the hurdle it falls on. The nature of democracy is really at stake.”

I’ve long argued that what’s being built in Europe is a new platform for Fascism. Continentals don’t have the same reflexes against it as the British do; their Napoleonic systems are already deeply autocratic in nature. This is very attractive to people like Blair, Brown and Mandelson, but hated by the English as a whole.

The steely bureaucrats of Brussels are terrified of Britain having a referendumed veto on this final nail in the coffin of democratic pluralism across Europe, which is why they have been making promises to Blair on the newly-created Presidency of the Council. Next year, Tony Blair could wield more power over us than new Prime Minister, David Cameron.

Silly, malleable Blair would be putty in the hands of the backroom power brokers of Brussels. At some stage he would be replaced by the longed-for “strong man” and … here we go again.

How did we sleepwalk into this?

Fascist Frankia is but a few steps away from completion. The 20th century is about to repeat itself.

Wake up, Britain. It’s not too late to get out.

Last week I wrote about the replacement of the postwar baby-boomer generation in our politics.

We have been passing through a period when the spoilt brats of the 1950s and 60s have held political power. Dr Spock’s experimental kidscape proved to be just as destructive as he himself later apologetically admitted it would be.

But consider what’s over the horizon. China has had a one-child per couple policy for decades. Most families made sure it was a boy … and boy, was he mollycoddled.

The young masters of China will be even more frustrated because there’ll be no wives for them. They will soon begin the climb to political power in a newly-resurgent superstate. With its massive reserves of cash and foreign assets, especially dollar-denominated, it will hold immense power over the rest of us.

Imagine such a powerhouse controlled by the spoilt brat generation.

No, let’s not go there.

Nick Clegg topped the Andrew Marr show this morning looking and sounding like a spoilt-brat school kid playing at being a politician. His adolescent attempts at damaging David Cameron with scornful invective misfired completely because it was so plainly not true.

After Gisela Stuart’s grown-up perceptiveness on the Lisbon Treaty, Clegg just seemed gullible and infantile. His boyish enthusiasm for all things euro was shallow and ill considered in the circumstances.

If this man is the next Leader of the Opposition, David Cameron is not going to face much flak from the other side of the House of Commons.

Clegg should be reminded of what happened when Sampson had a haircut.

Paraphernalia is everywhere. In various forms it blights our lives and gums up the works across the board. It’s hard to escape from the growing lakes and mountains of paraphernalia.

Consider weddings — where the word originated. Nowadays they can take a whole day to get through. All that’s really needed is for a couple, in everyday clothes, to walk into a church or registery office. The presiding officer then asks them if they really, really want to marry. If the answer is yes, they are pronounced man and wife and asked to sign a chitty. Next, please! The rest is paraphernalia.

Autobiographies are full of paraphernalia. Chapters on grandparents, parents, siblings, cousins and other family members, litter the pages with unwanted dross. By the time readers get to the real story, they’ve lost the will to live … and 25 quid.

I’ve been mulling this over because I’m considering writing a sort of autobiography without paraphernalia: A Life in Episodes. Sample episode: How I was betrayed by a fish and became a paid writer and photo-journalist at 12. It’s unmissable, I promise you.

Could we not get to grips with this paraphernalia overload in society rather than waste our time counting carbon footprints? We should recognize that they are paraphernalia too.

Automatic stabilizers are the pride of leftwing politicians and that strange group of economists known as Neo-Keynesians.

They kick in when the country goes into recession, automatically increasing spending as the economy splutters. They comprise various benefits paid to the unemployed as they are laid off in growing numbers.

Surely this must be a good thing? To listen to Labour ministers, you’d think so. The problem is, they have no ceiling once they start, and our system pays them out of borrowing, not investments. Borrowing has to be paid back out of taxes, which further depresses the economy.

An economy can easily spiral out of control under limitless “automatic stabilizers” and loss of tax revenue. The United Kingdom is a classic example of that right now.

Never has there been more need for a “social fund” to mop up the automatic stabilizing leakage in the national finances. Surely, there’s now an unstoppable impetus for putting the whole welfare budget on a sounder footing for the future?

Dan Brown’s latest novel, The Lost Symbol is now in the bookshops and, by all accounts, shooting off the shelves at supersonic velocities.

I bought a copy yesterday, despite a self-imposed ordinance not to buy any more books until I had finished writing my own: The Eternal Quest for Immortality — Is it staring you in the face?.

W.H. Smith is offering the £18.99 hardback at £5.99 if you buy 15 quid’s worth of stationery. How can anyone resist an offer like that? I just hope my own much more serious tome doesn’t face similar head-chopping discounts.

Does the author get a royalty on the stationery too? We should be told.

John Evans

Recent Related Commentary
DIARY: Fraser Nelson, Gordon Brown’s mental health, Baby boomers, Conference time, Marr’s bar, Quote of the Week
DIARY: Fannie Brown & Freddie Darling, Fatblogging, Farage farrago, Google Books, Originative intellectual workers
DIARY: Flanders and Harman, E8, Nick Robinson, Post Office, Dave and Gord, DCO, a Met Office August
DIARY: Nick Griffin, Longest sentence, End of West, Trident, Moses Cameron, Met Office

Andrew Hawkins, CEO of polling outfit ComRes is predicting a “no” vote in the Irish referendum on October 2nd: “Looking at likely Irish referendum result – difficult to call but on balance am expecting a ‘no’.” Let us hope he’s right. Polls are still showing strong support for the constitutional treaty, however.

The Irish are in a truly terrible state economically right now and may be looking back with nostalgia to the days when they received £6billion a year in subsidies from the EU, largely paid for by Germany. Those days are over and will not return.

They should consider instead that the mess they are now in was mainly caused by their entrapment in the euro currency system, which robs them of national sovereignty over their economy.

The most outrageous aspect of all this is that the Irish are once again voting for us too. Britain was denied its own promised referendum when Gordon Brown ratted on his manifesto pledge after doing a deal with Tony Blair over the presidency of the EU. This will go down as one of the great betrayals in British history, rivalling Lord Haw-Haw (William Joyce) during the war. He was hanged for it.

The German playwright Bertolt Brecht once wrote a poem in support of a peasant’s revolt. When he presented it to the leaders of the uprising, they told him, “Our people won’t like this. Can’t you change it?”

“There’s nothing wrong with the poem,” retorted Brecht, “Change your people.”

That’s what Ireland was asked to do after its initial “no” vote was rejected by Brussels. If French and Dutch votes against the original Euro constitution were so easily ignored, what chance have the Irish of overturning the bandwagon?

Actually, they only have to vote “no” again and demonstrate their contempt for Brussels for not listening to them in the first place. Whatever happens you can be sure though that the momentum towards European hegemony will continue.

Despite the spate of negative results in referendums on aspects of the European Union, the EU Commission and its heavyweight political supporters have not given up on their main aim: to convert the EU into a single country.

The proposed constitution — now called the Lisbon Treaty — would turn a grouping of nation states into a legal entity in its own right with the power to sign international treaties on behalf of member states and the right to overturn any nation’s laws. It includes an embryo army poised to requisition the forces of any EU country worth having, a currency, a flag, a “national” anthem, a passport system and the beginnings of a diplomatic corps with its own embassies around the world. It will also have a President of the “Council”, and a foreign ministry.

All it needs is a name.

The European Union is largely operated for, and on behalf of, Germany and France, the two original founders. What they want, they tend to get. In the treaty after next, assuming they find a way to browbeat Ireland into accepting most of the Lisbon Treaty, the question of the name of the new country of Europe is sure to figure. What might it be?

It would have to satisfy the egos of the Germans and the French and be mildly acceptable to the rest. One obvious name stands out: Frankia.

France was originally named after the Germanic tribe, the Franks, which gave us Charlemagne and other worthies of the “Holy Roman Empire”. It’s a name that would flatter both Paris and Berlin, and emphasize their status as joint controllers of the new European empire. The former French currency, naturally, was the franc.

The British would hate it, of course, and, assuming Labour governments are a thing of the past by then, would probably withdraw.

Frankia, in any shape or size, has never been in Britain’s national interest. Why do we, the most Eurosceptic nation in Europe, put up with this authoritarianism?

For the same reason we sleepwalked into two world wars in the last century. We preferred not to think about it until it became inevitable. Sometimes apathy can kill.

The Irish can do us a favour again by chucking the whole shenanigans in the bin. That simple act would give David Cameron the opportunity to call a vote in Britain after the General Election.

What happens then? A central core of countries will almost certainly decide to go it alone, sidelining Britain and Ireland, and possibly a few others as well.

Something like EFTA would re-emerge and we would go our own way, relatively free of continental interference.

We really do need that Irish “no” vote. So do the Irish.

John Evans

Recent Related Commentary
Saturday Ramble: From Camelot to Atlantis
Saturday Ramble: Is there anything left for Labour to break?
Saturday Ramble: Immortality opportunity
Saturday Ramble: A light in our darkness

A few weeks ago I picked up a newish book (2006) gloriously titled: Atlantis and the Kingdom of the Neanderthals.

No, it’s not a novel of the kind that spawned all those Doug McClure films back in the 1970s, where a mad professor travels to the centre of the earth in a spaceship crossed with a giant drill.

It’s actually a scholarly treatise on ancient civilizations by the world-famous author, Colin Wilson. Clearly the publisher’s marketing department came up with the title.

I’m glad they did. It set me thinking. But first a digression.

Colin Wilson began his career mistakenly dumped into the group of “Angry Young Men” of the 1950s. His first book, The Outsider, became a worldwide bestseller and began a long series of trademark Colin Wilson books that amalgamated psychology, philosophy, literature, history and science. His fanbase stretched from Russia to the west coast of America, dissolving the great ideological chasm of the time.

Colin writes about human potential in a way that attracts almost anyone on the planet who stops for a moment to ponder on what they are doing here, and how they could do it better. His latest book, Super Consciousness, encapsulates much of his thinking.

He has kindly endorsed my forthcoming book, The Eternal Quest for Immortality — Is it staring you in the face?. “This is really excellent,” he writes for the back cover. He is now writing a new novel which, judging from the opening chapter, will be a compulsive page-turner.

End of digression and back to that title: Atlantis and the Kingdom of the Neanderthals:

JFK had his “Camelot”, a weird confection of people and actresses that suggested a Golden Age for America and the world. It ended three years later with the death of “Arthur” and the end of the new Pre-Raphaelite dream.

Following on from Gordon Brown’s Kingdom of the Neanderthals, and inheriting the worst mess ever left by any British government, does David Cameron need his own “myth” to sustain the drive to make Britain great again?

All successful leaders create a myth, an archetypal story that defines their aims and direction of travel. Margaret Thatcher was the Iron Lady who brooked no backsliding, Winston Churchill, the Indefatigable British Warleader. What will Dave’s “myth” be?

In all humility, may I suggest: The New Atlantis, destroyer of the Kingdom of the Neanderthals, the bringer of peace, innovation and prosperity. I’m serious, although it’s hard to be that serious on a Friday afternoon.

Cameron is good at technology, as were Plato’s Atlanteans. Britain is an island nation, progenitor of the Industrial Revolution and the greatest navy the world has ever seen. We spanned the world once, with an Empire upon which the sun never set.

The New Conservative British Atlantis will set the course for a future worthy of our past.

Even Doug Osborne McClure — his full name, curiously — would have been proud to star in the movie.

PS: I shall be following up this strand with occasional Notes from Atlantis on the Conservative project. Only in Syntagma — unless someone comes up with a better offer.

John Evans, Atlantis Correspondent

Recent Related Commentary
Saturday Ramble: Is there anything left for Labour to break?
Saturday Ramble: Immortality opportunity
Saturday Ramble: A light in our darkness
Saturday Ramble: David Cameron diminished