The Home Office, Rights and Superdemocracy
Warning : This is totally off-topic and is inspired by yesterday’s news of the rapidly disintegrating state of the British Home Office under Tony Blair’s pitiful administration.
It’s not a rant though. Promise. Just a look at the Panglossian fantasies that drive British policy nowadays : “Everything for the best, in the best of all possible worlds”.
The UK Home Secretary has said that the Home Office is “not fit for purposeâ€. It has lost control over almost every aspect of the criminal justice system, the prisons and immigration.
The root of the problem is the Blairite Human Rights Act, passed in jubilant self-congratulation in 1998, plus a delegation policy that places key people in post by political persuasion rather than competence. Both break the fundamental principles of Superdemocracy.
The idea of a Rights Society is all the rage in Labour-dominated Britain. It sounds good. We all have defined rights which mean we’re free, yes?
NO.
Freedom is not about giving everyone and anyone “rights†without checks and balances. Many of the rights we have we make for ourselves, through hard work and merit. Merit brings us wealth and allows us the freedom to enjoy the best things in life without too much worry or disturbance.
Basic rights, like equality before the law, God and the ballot box, are the rights of all citizens in any democratic country. Some of these rights should not be given to anybody who simply turns up on its shores. Civil liberties don’t travel beyond the jurisdiction that defines them.
Cast these rights liberally around to everyone on the planet and they will act as magnets for mass, unstoppable immigration of people who know only two words of English, “My rights”.
The so-called Human Rights Act allows anyone who enters Britain full rights to the treasure of its citizens, even as far as mandatory housing, health care, schooling, legal bills, and a “salary†for life. Since newcomers have not earned these “rights†they just impoverish the country’s citizens, without adding a jot to the nation’s well-being.
Of course, if you say that, you risk sounding rather mean-spirited. That’s the weapon of choice in destroying the truth in this case. The government has woven new taboos against challenging any of its equality agenda, even embedding them into statute law. Never mind that this kind of equality : equality of attributes, needs a totalitarian regime to enforce, you are stigmatized if you complain.
The reason for this Home Office-induced catastrophe is that decisions are taken by greenhorn, starry-eyed politicians and their political appointees, who see themselves as benefactors of mankind — albeit with other people’s money and lives. They have no idea of the complexities of the case, nor of the huge response they are initiating.
Moreover, nearly every agency in Britian is now run by knee-jerk Blairites who act according to political received opinion rather than careful, dispassionate, and expert consideration of the situation.
Merit is the way out of this morass of incompetence and waste. A common cry in England now is “Nothing works anymoreâ€. That’s because the “All shall have prizes society†is run by dolts and slackers, as could be predicted before it was imposed on us.
When each critical decision, no matter how small, is taken at the point of maximum competence, near enough, everybody in the community benefits in an cumulative way. The small increments of improvement mount up over time, completely transforming the landscape and the way it operates. That’s Superdemocracy.
So-called Human Rights are a way of moving resources from the competent who have worked for them, to the incompetent who have not. It depletes a society’s level of expertise and tilts the slope of impoverishment ever more steeply downwards.
The Rights Society should be replaced with Superdemocracy, especially in the public sector where chaos finds its natural breeding ground. The Home Office is just one example that needs to be addressed in haste.




Have you noticed how “mean-spirited” is the new trump card? Once someone has accused you of being mean-spirited, at least here in the United States, there’s really nothing left you can say. Interesting development…
By Cyndi L on January 10th, 2007 at 9:32 pm
That’s true, Cyndi. Thoughtful points are thrown back in your face like you’re a criminal to mention them. It’s a sad time here in Britain. We’ve lost touch with reality big time. Can’t speak for the States, of course.
By John Evans on January 10th, 2007 at 9:42 pm
[...] Most jobs have large legacy pots comprising fixed areas of responsibility, usually maintained by protectionist clutter like trade union demarcations, “Spanish practices”, and just sheer inertia. Sometimes a job title is so all-embracing that it is difficult to see the absurdities embedded in it. The UK “Home Secretary” is a case in point. [...]
By » SYNTAGMA - Online Publishing, Tech and Media on January 23rd, 2007 at 2:06 pm